| Instructor 
 Shannon Bradshaw, Ph.D.Office Hours302 Hall of Sciences
 973.408.3198
 sbradsha at drew dot edu
 http://users.drew.edu/sbradsha
 
 
 
 Schedule (Subject to change)
 
						Week 1
 
							Week 2
								Reading (18 Sep @ 9am): Keen pp. 1-9 
							
 
Writing (18 Sep @ 9am): Through research on the Web and
						in the library, develop and
						write a response to the
						paragraph in Keen's
						Introduction to which you were
						assigned. Your response should
						be 2-3 pages, single-spaced
						using a 12 point font.
							 
 
							Week 3
								No class: Professor Bradshaw will be presenting a paper at Hypertext 2007 in Manchester, England.
							 
 
  Week 4
  Discussion We will discuss a selection of your responses to Keen's introduction.
  
 
  Reviewing (25 Sep @ 9am): Review the papers written by other class members whose topic was the same as yours for the first writing assignment. As you review, ask the following three questions:
  1) What is the central thesis of the paper? 2) What is the outline of the author's argument? 3) What do I find compelling in each point of this argument? 4) What do I find unconvincing? Send each author and me (sbradsha@drew.edu) an email containing your critique. 
  
 
  Reading (25 Sep @ 9am): Keen Ch 1
  
 
  Writing (20 Sep @ 9am): Dean's Office writing assignment (see Google Docs). Print a copy of your completed assignment and bring it to class.
   
 
  Week 5
  Discussion Keen Chapter 1; Your participation in a blog discussion.
  
 
  Reading (2 Oct @ 9am): Keen Ch 2
  
 
  Participation (27 Sep @ 9am): Identify a blog post on a subject of
  interest to you. The post should be no more than 1 day old and should have
  at least five comments from other readers. Participate in the ongoing
  discussion around the post by making at least two comments in response to
  the original post or another readers comments. Be prepared to discuss your
  topic and the conversation in which you participated. To
  find blogs, I recommend using Technorati. Technorati is a search
  engine oriented toward blogs. It provides 
  information on the bloggers, blogs, and individual posts. While there, you
  might investigate how Technorati determines "authority scores" for bloggers.
  
  Research (2 Oct @ 9am): In chapters 1 and 2, Keen argues that blogs
  and other forms of "democratized media" are largely inaccurate and
  untrustworthy as a source of news. Using the library and publicly available 
  on-line resources, compile a bibliography to use in researching the question
  of reliability with regard to news sources such as blogs.
 
 
  Week 6
  Discussion: Reviewing and critique of on another's bibliographies due today.
  
 
  Discussion: Work on developing a specific topic for your blog
  reliability paper.
  
 
  Discussion: Keen Ch. 2
  
 
 
  Week 7
  Writing: (Due Thu) Develop your thesis statement and outline for your
  blog reliability paper.
  
 
  Discussion: Keen Ch. 3
  
 
 
  Week 11
  Reading: 
    
  
 
  Writing: (Due Tue 30 Oct @ 9am) Write your blog reliability paper
  building upon the thesis, sources, and outline you developed last week. You
  paper must be three pages in a 12 pt. font with one inch margins. Submit your paper via
  email to me.
  
 
  Discussion: Wikipedia
  
 
 
  Week 12
  Reading: 
 
 
      Read the two general education proposals I handed out in class on 13 Nov.Read the front page of the NY Times (on-line is free) Tuesday, Wednesday, and
  Thursday of this week.
   
Writing: (Due Mon 26 Nov @ 9am) Write a Wikipedia article on a topic
  of your choosing. Your article should be at least 1000 words and follow the
  guidelines of neutral
  point of view, verifiability
  (see also examples
  of reliable sources,
  and no
  original research. Your article will be graded largely on your adherence
  to these guidelines. Please remember that you are writing a public document
  that should be clear to a majority of people and of general interest.
 You should review the following before beginning your article:
 
 
 
 
  Week 13Reading: Educational Choices General Educational Proposal handed out in
  class.
 Discussion:
    
      How would you respond to such a policy? What choices would you make?What are the challenges inherent in such a policy?How would it affect the registration process?What courses would you choose outside your major/minor program? 
 
  Reading: Keen Ch. 4, 5
 Reading: Wikipedia Articles written/edited by other members of
  the class:
 
Writing: (Due Mon 10 Dec 2007) Following the spirit of the Educational Choices
  General Education Proposal, craft a proposal for your course of study for the next three
  years at Drew. Your proposal should include the following elements:
     
 A statement of your objectives for what you want to accomplish and
      who you want to be during the next three years and in your life after Drew.
 A coherent outline of the subjects you can address at Drew that will
      help you achieve these objectives. 
 A coherent set of courses for each of the six semesters
      following Spring 2008. You should pay attention to the the frequency with which a given
      course is offered as stated in the College
      catalog.
 A rationale for each course explaining how it will help you to
      achieve one or more of your objectives.
 |